
Last Updated: August 19, 2026
TL;DR
The legal requirements of Article 50 of the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act came into effect as of Aug. 2, 2026. This means that from now forward companies operating within the European Union (EU) will be required to provide labels for people who view their content indicating if the content was created or altered with an artificial intelligence (AI).
A little background information: While I am a marketer, I am certainly not a lawyer. If Article 50 will significantly affect your business, please consider consulting with an attorney. With that being said; this article is intended for informational purposes only.
Providers are companies that develop tools which allow users to generate AI-generated content. However, if you utilize a tool to create AI-content for your company, then you are considered a deployer. Article 50's reach goes beyond a company having a European office or headquarters. If you produce content utilizing AI that is then accessed within the EU, then the regulation will apply to you.
For those in and operate within the U.S., it means that you won’t be forced to comply with this particular regulation until your long-term strategy expands to the EU market. Although, I feel the United States will have something similar in the not so distant future.
Here are a couple of ways to prepare:
• Read the regulations and incorporate them into your current workflow.
• Use visual AI generated content in a stylized manner, rather than leaning into realism.
• The easiest: Stop AI use in the creation process altogether, and only use it during the ideation process.
Are color corrections included? No. Standard editing practices, such as color corrections, don’t alter the original human input will remain unaffected by this law.
There is also an interesting exception made for publicly important text (e.g., press releases), where a human editor has reviewed the text produced by an AI system and accepts full responsibility for its publication.
AI assisted text will not have to be labeled (as of this writing) if it was reviewed by a human editor for substance. The difference here would be a casual glance vs. editing a blog post and deciding if it meets a quality standard and accuracy.
A good way to look at Article 50 is this. Is the media a generated image that could pass as real, or is it an animated cartoon character riding a unicorn over the Eiffel Tower? The latter generally does not qualify.
What happens if you fail to provide the necessary disclosure of AI-generated content? Fines. Very large Fines. If Article 50 applies to your business, the maximum penalty could be as high as €15 million or 3% of your global annual turnover (whichever is greater).
Separately Article 4 of the Act also prohibits businesses from using AI without understanding basic risk of generating completely false information through AI models. There is no proof or certification required for organizations in order to meet this requirement, but if they ever get investigated by an EU regulator, and do not have a labeling system in place, they are subject to a fine and breaking the law. The code of practice on how an organization is marking and labelling AI-generated content (finalized in June 2026) is purely confined within the institution.
Regardless of whether the EU ever takes notice; you will need a functional internal mechanism for tracking this type of content throughout your organization. This can become disastrous if it is not properly documented. Apart from AI entirely, falsified endorsements are investigated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regardless of what specific technology was used to fake them. Globally major social media platforms are already enforcing their own versions of transparency guidelines to help protect their user base from misinformation and/or misrepresentation. "AI Info" labels now appear at the top of posts when AI indicators or disclosures are detected.
Meta labels many AI-generated posts on both Facebook and Instagram. Youtube is even stricter in regard to this requirement. Most demand that creators openly disclose any synthetic content uploaded to their platform.
One of the best ways that I have found is having a repeatable method for identifying and tagging all the AI-generated content in your workflows.
(Note: Editing photos in Photoshop is exempt. However, keep in mind that if you are manually doctoring content in order to deceive consumers is still covered under general consumer protection, and anti-fraud laws. Article 50 covers deepfakes,, and AI-generated/manipulated audio, video, text, AI upscaling, or anything that mimics reality)
In order to help with navigating the topic, I’ve created a free tool for exactly this, called ai-transparency.site.
After opening the website, you will notice that there are several navigational options. The easiest way is to fill out a short questionnaire about the piece of content in question and it will provide suggestions on whether it likely contains any disclosures that may be required. Remember this is just this tool and should only be used as a starting point.
If you post using AI-assisted or generated content and have not built a disclosure system, this may be a good week to start creating the framework.

Lionel Lowery
I'm Lionel, a marketing and brand strategist who helps clients find clarity and build systems that hold up.
unsure where to start?
Free brand and web audit. No email signup.
Five minutes, a real report, and nothing to unsubscribe from later.