You're Asking Your Community for the Wrong Thing
- Lionel Lowery
- August 10, 2026
Last Updated: August 19, 2026
TL;DR
- The Royal Society for Blind Children (RSBC) recorded something parents already do every night rather than asking parents to do something new.
- The mechanic: look for existing behavior you can capture before you design your new ask.
- The limit: capturing behavior still requires infrastructure you have to build.
- It just frees up more of your budget you’d otherwise spend on artificially manufacturing adoption, to put into building the product instead.
What Actually Happened
RSBC partnered with the agency INNOCEAN Berlin, to create an app called Bedtime Donations. Parents download the app and record themselves reading public domain children’s books aloud. Those audiobook donations get reviewed before getting added to the library of free audiobooks distributed to blind and visually impaired children. Public domain books are rarely made accessible to blind readers (over 90% of published books are inaccessible), and the families who need these audiobooks most can’t afford them.
RSBC excluded AI narration completely. Their case study describes blind children catch onto a synthetic voice almost instantly, meaning a human-led reading of the book had to be part of the product itself. That only works because the supply chain already existed.
The Framework
RSBC didn’t create a new behavior and then spend money convincing people to actually do it. Every night, millions of parents already read bedtime stories aloud at home to their own children for free. Outside organizations don’t ask them to, because it isn’t possible to organize thousands upon thousands of kids into the same room at once, let alone read aloud to them all. RSBC gave reading aloud to kids a second purpose.
Supply side solved itself by sourcing books from the public domain completely avoiding licensing fees, which matters but isn’t the most scalable part of the lesson. The reading itself (the voices doing the reading) already existed before RSBC ever built that infrastructure.
“It's not about money, it's about inclusion.” Dave Steele. British poet, author, speaker, & The Blind Poet on RSBC’s campaign video.
RSBC exhausted their entire starting library of public domain stories in under one week. The container wasn’t too small. Universities and authors reached out after the initial catalog was exhausted to donate private works once they saw how fast the program took off, which is cultural adoption in four words.
BJ Fogg’s Behavior Model breaks any behavior down into three requirements: motivation, ability, and prompt. All three requirements must be present at the same time for a behavior to occur. Most nonprofit campaigns fail by going after the hardest half: creating motivation for a new behavior from nothing. RSBC’s campaign already had two of the three covered. Parents had the motivation to read aloud to children at bedtime. Bedtime was the prompt.
Instead, RSBC built ability. RSBC built the ability for parents to press record and send in a story whenever they already do it, then repurposed that audio file into a reason another family will read to their child. And it didn’t end with just recording a story. Parents can fulfill the call to action by reading their child a story, playing a recorded story for their child, or passing the app on to another family who can do both.
Why It's Worth a Second Look
This lesson doesn’t apply to audiobooks or accessibility programs uniquely. It’s a lesson on where to look first when you’re trying to convert goodwill into action.
The testimonial gap an average business suffers from isn’t filled by asking for testimonials because customers already tell them unprompted everywhere you’re not listening. There’s a gap between what people say informally to friends, family, and colleagues, and what you actually collect on a routine basis. It’s not because your customers don’t feel great about your brand; it’s because nobody bothered to catch what they’re already saying.
Nonprofits trying to source user-generated content from their beneficiaries and volunteers are going around the same room full of passionate people every day that already tell their story on a routine basis. They don’t need training on how to share their story or a new angle.
Hosting a donation drive or event and not capturing guest reactions on-site a missed opportunity. Set up a “Share the Love” table with a volunteer and a microphone so you can catch audio testimonials on the spot. For a more conservative budget, lay out notecards, a pen, and a submission box, and you’ve done 90% of what that phone would. Any of those options are better than sending your donors home with a survey because the interaction will happen regardless; the question is where you’re willing to catch it.
The lesson is we always ask for something new. “Send us a testimonial.” “Record your story.” “Fill out our feedback form.” Asking for that stuff isn’t bad. Learning what your audience already does in the moment so well that you can stick a secondary purpose on it instead of pretending it doesn’t happen is. It’s the Ability over Motivation lesson from BJ Fogg’s model above applied one step backward.
This applies to more than just testimonials. What quantifiable action does your audience take already at whatever price or friction level that best suits your brand that you can plug directly into instead of work around? Said action has to actually fit your brand, your voice, your standards, and whatever it is you do that makes people trust you when you ask in the first place.
Who Else Is Already Doing This
RSBC isn't the first or last to take this approach. Move For Hunger's Campus Move Out program gives students moving out of campus dorms a collection bag before they leave. Instead of tossing their leftover unopened food in the trash, students fill the bag with it and give it back to campus dining services to donate. Move For Hunger just made the bags available. Last program season, Campus Move Out collected over 9,000 lbs of food across 91 properties alone.
Olio, a food-sharing app, takes the exact same approach digitally. Nobody just throws food away. Everybody has food they don’t plan on eating right now. Olio just gives them a place to list it first instead of building an infrastructure that asks your audience to buy or produce new things just to donate them.
The Limit
Capturing existing behavior is never free. RSBC had to build an app. They still staff reviewers to approve audiobooks for accessibility/safety reasons. They built two entire user interfaces to WCAG AAA standards. Recording parents reading books already didn’t pay for the app itself. It just lowered the lifetime cost of each new audiobook added to the library. More of RSBC’s budget can go towards the product development instead of marketing spent convincing parents their kids need to hear these stories. The math still applies whether you have neither nor both.
How to Put This Into Action
Pre-flight checklist before your next campaign, community program, or content push:
- What is my audience already doing unprompted that I have no system in place to capture?
- Where does that behavior occur: IRL, online, casually, digitally?
- What’s the smallest container I could build to capture it without creating friction for what people already do?
- Once I capture it, where does it go? Where/how do people see it next?
- What am I tempted to ask for instead? And if I asked for that, is my ask solving a problem that doesn’t actually exist?
Lionel Lowery
I'm Lionel, a marketing and brand strategist who helps clients find clarity and build systems that hold up.
unsure where to start?
Free brand and web audit. No email signup.
Five minutes, a real report, and nothing to unsubscribe from later.